A very interesting article commenting on the region's air defence radar network status as Dummies seem to think that it is working as if like some sort of a force field protecting the nation. Come on even in the movies the force field shield only comes on when the threat is detected. Sheesh!
Published:
Monday March 24, 2014 MYT 1:44:00 PM
Updated:
Monday March 24, 2014 MYT 1:50:18 PM
WAS the Malaysian air force sleeping on the job? How could an
unidentified aircraft fly through Malaysian air space without the air
force sitting up and being on high alert? Why were no jets scrambled?
How secure is our air space?
Those are some of the questions many have been asking since Flight MH370 went missing.
The March 8 flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing was flying over the
South China Sea heading into Vietnam air space when someone deliberately
switched off the transponder at 1.21am making it disappear from the air
traffic control (ATC) radar screen.
The Boeing 777 passenger plane carrying 239 people including 12 crew
then made a turnaround crossing back into Malaysian airspace.
Unchallenged and unidentified – although it was picked up as a blip by
the military’s primary radar at 2.15am (although not in real time) - it
flew over Penang before disappearing towards the Indian Ocean.
Aerospace Defence Consultant Ravi Madavaram insists the military did no wrong.
“From my point of view, they didn’t make a mistake. They didn’t miss a
military aircraft. They missed a commercial aircraft which is not their
job anyway (to monitor).”
He stresses that the objectives of the military’s primary radar and commercial secondary radar are very different.
The secondary radar, he says, is used by the air traffic control (ATC)
to track commercial aircraft as much as possible especially during
landing and takeoff, which are the critical stages of a flight.
It requires fast response and communication is done via a transponder in the cockpit of the aircraft.
The military, on the other hand, uses a primary radar as its purpose is to track which airplane is a friend or foe.
It does not need a transponder because typically an enemy aircraft will not respond.
The primary radar hardware is automated and gives out blips every four to 12 seconds.
A military jet would give out a very small signal on the radar, says
Ravi of Frost & Sullivan, while a commercial jet will give a big
reading.
“So I can understand if nobody gets excited over the MH370 passing
because from the primary radar they can see that it’s too big to be a
military aircraft and it looks like a commercial aircraft which is
flying off route so they just ignore it.”
If it is something small and moving fast, like a fighter jet, that is
when the air force will take it seriously and be on the alert, he adds.
For him, overlooking that passing of MH370 is totally forgivable given
the fact that Malaysia has “not seen much territorial attacks” nor does
it face threats from neighbouring countries.
“Military and perspective work in a particular setting. If it is an
object between China and India, or India and Pakistan, then everyone is
going to put their jets up because you have that war scenario there and
everything needs to be regularly checked.”
But Malaysia and its neighbouring countries are generally peaceful
countries, he says, so they are not thinking “this is war” and that
readiness might not be there.
The readiness is not in isolation, he says. It goes very much hand in
hand with intelligence, which may suggest a possible incursion, or that
people are planning something.
In the case of the MH370, there was nothing of that sort.
Radar expert Hans Weber says normally when an unidentified plane is in
detectable range, the chain of command of the radar site will try to
contact the plane by radio and ask it to identify itself. When there is
no answer, fighter jets may be launched to try and identify it or signal
it to land at the nearest airport or, if there is still no response, to
take the tough decision to shoot it down.
“But all this depends on a number of factors including whether the
nation feels threatened and whether the plane was flying towards an
important target,” he adds.
Aviation analyst Gerry Soejatman points out that there is still no full
information as to how the MH370 trajectory behaved on the radar.
“It does raise questions, but we must also understand that this was not
an unidentified object approaching a vital object/infrastructure/target
in a suspicious manner.
“If it did, then yes, a lot of questions are going to be asked.”
He notes that the military did suspect it was the MH370 turning back for
reasons unknown to them and the military protocol would be to observe
its behaviour and try to determine whether it was in distress or whether
it was going to be a threat.
“The aircraft rightly so at the time was determined not to be a threat
hence not intercepted. Before they realised the full extent of the
situation, the aircraft had slipped far enough to make interception
impractical or impossible.
“If this is a case of an unidentified aircraft coming out of nowhere
aimed towards the peninsula, then a threat level would exist and
possibly lead to interception.
“We must answer the question whether the action of the Malaysian Air
Force was reasonable or not at that time; and not by using the benefit
of hindsight because hindsight is always 20/20.”
It has been just over two weeks since MH370 went missing, and some 26
countries have now joined in the massive search and rescue operation to
find it.
The last known signal from the aircraft came from an Inmarsat satellite
at 8.11am indicating that it had travelled another six hours after
leaving the west coast of Malaysia and out of the range of Malaysia’s
military primary radar.
Countries in the northern arc and southern arc where the aircraft might
have headed have been asked to check their own radar data to see if the
plane had passed over their air space.
But therein lies some difficulties, some which might be potentially embarrassing or revealing.
If MH370 did cross into the airspace of other countries unnoticed, Weber
says, it would also mean that the air defence in those countries might
be a bit lax in the wee hours of the morning.
“But it might have flown a normal flight path at a normal altitude in a
heavily travelled air corridor and thus did not get anybody to raise an
alarm.”
Soejatman says that if the aircraft did enter another country’s
territory, “we would also need to know how it did it before we can
question why no red flags were raised”.
“There are tricks that can be adopted to enter a country using another
aircraft to “piggyback”, this would make it extremely difficult for the
flight to have been detected as it enters a country’s territory.”
MIT aeronautics and astronautics professor Dr R. John Hansman says MH370
did not have to cross the airspace of other countries as it could have
remained over international waters away from countries or military
radar.
One startling revelation to come out of this search and rescue operation
was when India admitted that its radar in Nicobar and Andaman were shut
at the time of the MH370 flight due to budget constraints.
Ravi says that while this might help Malaysia try and figure out where
the aircraft has gone, India is not helping itself by giving that away.
“They are showing themselves in a bad light to an enemy who can do damage to their country.
“The main purpose of the military is to protect the country. I don’t
think for a missing aircraft countries are going to expose their
limitations,” he says.
He points out too that if any other country had switched off their radar
to cut costs, in all likelihood they would not disclose this
information to other countries, because it would not look good on them
and their military.
Ravi points out that operating a primary radar is expensive because it
beams a very strong signal which requires a lot of electricity and hence
money to keep it on 24 hours.
So it would not come as a surprise to him if some of the poorer
countries with no high security threats do not have their radar switched
on all the time.
“But they will just say ‘we didn’t see the plane on our radar’ which is
the truth because their radar was switched off. But it does not mean it
didn’t pass through their air space.”
Dr Hansman believes that countries would not be prepared to put aside
their own security concerns and share data that might give away their
defence capabilities just to find a missing aircraft. “They would not
compromise their security,” he says.
Concurring, Weber says he would not be surprised if the defence radar
systems of other countries have radar information, which they have not
yet revealed.
“This would be typical for the military.”
As Soejatman rightly points out, “defence is not just about capability, but also hiding such capability or the lack of it”.
He notes that no country will publicly admit to using classified technologies to find the aircraft.
“Such exchange of information using these special capabilities is likely
to already be happening behind the scenes among friendly nations or
through a friendly nation.
“What we are seeing are the non-classified capabilities being used.
“Beyond that, any country would be foolish to disclose the use of classified technology without careful consideration.”
He also says that the satellite imagery data that we are seeing are of non-classified capabilities only.
As for Malaysia, they have come out to say that they have revealed and
shared their raw data with other countries, even putting the country’s
intelligence second to finding the aircraft.
But doesn’t this make the country vulnerable security wise?
Ravi thinks it does. “But at this point of time, Malaysia doesn’t have a
choice but to give out all that information. Not finding the aircraft
will have huge repercussions in terms of the economy and the scenario of
the country and I don’t think Malaysia can run that risk.
“And even with giving out that information, they can’t find the
aircraft. Imagine if they didn’t give out that information? It does
impact a bit on Malaysia’s military capabilities but you cannot not give
out the information,” he says.
Ravi also points out the irony is that the aviation industry is one of
the most high tech industries in the world. Yet, despite all the
advances in technology, the aircraft is still missing.
“It is unprecedented,” he says.
